2013
DOI: 10.1177/1052562913488109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preference for Anonymous Classroom Participation

Abstract: Electronic response systems (ERS) are a means to foster class participation by students who are reluctant to participate in class. In this study, we identify individual characteristics that relate to students' preference for anonymous classroom participation, and we also examine the extent to which preference for anonymity is related to their reactions to ERS. We find that extraversion is negatively related and both performance-avoid orientation and power distance orientation are positively related to preferen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(114 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anonymity feature was said to increase students' willingness to participate in class and make the class more interactive. Latham and Hill (2013) also confirmed similar preferences of students for anonymity in their study and encouraged students' anonymous participation in the classroom. The present research differed from the two previous studies in that it was the online chat box that brought forth anonymous participation in this study while similar engagement was accomplished by electronic response systems in the two previous studies (Heaslip et al, 2013;Latham and Hill, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The anonymity feature was said to increase students' willingness to participate in class and make the class more interactive. Latham and Hill (2013) also confirmed similar preferences of students for anonymity in their study and encouraged students' anonymous participation in the classroom. The present research differed from the two previous studies in that it was the online chat box that brought forth anonymous participation in this study while similar engagement was accomplished by electronic response systems in the two previous studies (Heaslip et al, 2013;Latham and Hill, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…For instance, researchers have looked into the effectiveness of student participation in learning (Crosthwaite et al, 2015;Chou & He, 2016). They also examine different kinds of student participation such as voluntary participation, (Dallimore et al, 2012), anonymous participation (Latham & Hill, 2013) oral participation, and silent participation as well as online discussion (Kim et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, instructors must consider instruction and expectations from the student perspective and think about how we might inadvertently isolate students from marginalized backgrounds. Students from cultures with highly defined power distance, for example, may be hesitant to jump into large classroom conversations if put on the spot without warning (Latham & Hill, 2014). Silence in the classroom should not always be taken as a sign of disengagement; it may signal deeper differences in understanding or comfort with the type of engagement encouraged in class.…”
Section: Small Changes: Pedagogical Changes In Your Classroommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive feedback of the majority paves the way for the lecturer to continue lecturing. However, given the diversity of the audience, the level of understanding tends to change because some will be fast learners while others might be slow or moderate on a certain topic, and will refrain from expressing their concerns due to certain reasons such as shyness [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%