2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.10.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferable removal of phosphate from water using hydrous zirconium oxide-based nanocomposite of high stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
64
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar trend was observed in the study of the anaerobic tank effluent. All P concentrations dropped to the discharge standard (0.5 mg/L) in 20 mL of real wastewater with the addition of 0.05 g of adsorbent. These results are encouraging and confirm the potential of Fe 3 O 4 /PAM/SA–Zr for phosphate removal in practical applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar trend was observed in the study of the anaerobic tank effluent. All P concentrations dropped to the discharge standard (0.5 mg/L) in 20 mL of real wastewater with the addition of 0.05 g of adsorbent. These results are encouraging and confirm the potential of Fe 3 O 4 /PAM/SA–Zr for phosphate removal in practical applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diminishing supply 11 of phosphorus necessitates the consideration of its recovery from 12 wastewater streams [2]. On the other hand, excessive phosphorus 13 in wastewater usually results in eutrophication in rivers and lakes, 14 which is an issue of global concern [3,4]. Employment of an 15 efficient method for reducing and recycling phosphates during 16 wastewater treatment is a fundamental factor in preventing 17 eutrophication.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among 21 various available technologies for phosphate decontamination, the 22 adsorption method is relatively simple, economical, and highly 23 efficient [5,6]. Various types of materials have been used as 24 adsorbents, such as Fe-Mn binary oxide [7], a metal oxide 25 adsorbent derived from manganese ore tailings [8], nanostruc- 26 tured Fe(III)-Cu(II) binary oxides [9], mesoporous Cr-Zr binary 27 oxide nanoadsorbent [10], magnetic Fe-Zr binary oxide [11], 28 aluminum compounds [12][13][14], and hydrous zirconium oxide- 29 based nanocomposites [4]. Composite metal oxides may show 30 physicochemical properties different from those of their single- 31 component oxide counterparts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Composite metal oxides may show different physicochemical properties from those of their single-component counterparts [22]. For instance, Al-Fe hydroxide, mesoporous Cr-Zr binary oxide nanoadsorbent, hydrous zirconium oxide-based nanocomposites, and Fe-Al-Mn trimetal oxide have been reported as phosphate-ion-removal agents [24][25][26][27]. In addition, we previously reported that nickel hydroxide, cobalt hydroxide, and cobalt-containing nickel hydroxide show sufficient capabilities for phosphate ion adsorption [20,22,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%