INTRODUCTIONDecreased sense of smell is a common problem affecting approximately 61-69% of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and is one of the four signs and symptoms used to diagnose CRS. 1 Olfactory impairment negatively impacts patients' quality of life and ability to function safely in day to day life. 2 Despite being a common complaint in the setting of sinusitis, relatively little objective data is available regarding the impact of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) on olfactory function. Much of the olfactory literature is based on subjective reports of olfactory function, which do not accurately assess objective olfactory impairment. 3-4 A small number of prospective studies with objective olfactory outcomes have been performed with mixed results. 3, 5-10 The use of different olfactory measures and definitions of improvement have added confusion to the interpretation of results. Additionally, the majority of studies report short-term follow up of 6 months or less and do not account for long-term changes that may occur in the post-operative period.In this multi-institutional, prospective cohort study, the impact of ESS on olfactory impairment in patients with CRS was objectively examined over 6 month and 12 month follow up. We hypothesized that patients with mild olfactory impairment (hyposmia) would benefit from ESS whereas patients with severe olfactory impairment (anosmia) would not.
MATERIALS & METHODS
Study Population and Data CollectionStudy subjects were recruited from three tertiary care centers over a three-year period as part of a multi-institutional prospective cohort study. All patients had a diagnosis of CRS based on All study protocols and informed consent were collected and approved by the Institutional Review Boards at each study site.
Measurement of Olfactory FunctionThe SIT from Sensonics, Inc., an objective measure of olfactory function, was administered to patients. 15 The SIT is a validated 40 question forced-choice test (total score: 0-40) with high test-retest reliability (r > 0.90) and is highly correlated with more sophisticated measures of olfactory dysfunction (r> 0.80). 16-17 Absolute SIT scores were categorized into olfactory severity categories based on robust gender-adjusted, normative data (normosmics: men with SIT scores 34-40 and women with SIT scores 35-40; microsmics/hyposmics: men with SIT scores 19-33 and women with SIT scores 19-34; anosmics: men and women with SIT scores 6-18). 15 Patients with SIT scores 0-5 were categorized as malingering and removed from the analyses (n=4). Age was not part of the classification system and was included as a covariate and adjusted for in the analyses.
Statistical AnalysesAll statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v.16.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Baseline demographics, clinical factors, and changes in mean 12-month postoperative SIT scores were compared across preoperative olfactory diagnostic categories using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Chi-square analyses where appropriate. A two-tailed p-value ≤...