2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Spermatogenesis in Orchiectomy Specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
15
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
15
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall rate of spermatogenesis in our study was 68%, comparable with the reports by Delouya et al (20) and Choy et al (21), who found rates of 79% and 62%, respectively. Hence, sperm can be found in the resected testicle of most patients with TC, and can potentially be extracted during orchiectomy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The overall rate of spermatogenesis in our study was 68%, comparable with the reports by Delouya et al (20) and Choy et al (21), who found rates of 79% and 62%, respectively. Hence, sperm can be found in the resected testicle of most patients with TC, and can potentially be extracted during orchiectomy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Consequently, although the results of Delouya et al (20) imply a systemic effect of testis cancer on spermatogenesis, our findings suggest that local tumor burden impacts the most. The inverse relation between tumor size and the occurrence of spermatogenesis has been previously described (20,21); however, even in the presence of very large tumors (10 cm), we were able to identify spermatozoa in the rim of testicular parenchyma. In addition, we found mature spermatozoa in the pathological specimens of 68.7% (11/16 patients) with a preorchiectomy diagnosis and evaluation of primary infertility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was a statistically significant inverse relationship between tumor size and spermatogenesis presence; however, a larger tumor size did not preclude the presence of spermatogenesis. 49 Published success rates are up to 40% to 60% for onco-TESE, but it is difficult to generalize due to the low number of patients. [49][50][51] Also, some surgeons argue that patients with nonobstructive azoospermia should be treated with a microsurgical (micro)-TESE on the side of the testicular tumor.…”
Section: Masturbationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 Published success rates are up to 40% to 60% for onco-TESE, but it is difficult to generalize due to the low number of patients. [49][50][51] Also, some surgeons argue that patients with nonobstructive azoospermia should be treated with a microsurgical (micro)-TESE on the side of the testicular tumor. They also recommend having a discussion about a contralateral micro-TESE at the time of orchiectomy.…”
Section: Masturbationmentioning
confidence: 99%