2019
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1631396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of return to work after stroke: a prospective, observational cohort study with 6 months follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both were found to decrease after RTW in a statistically significant manner, dropping by 64% (job involvement) and 59% (job satisfaction). The unique study with a Latin American sample [ 30 ] showed that 44% of the participants returned to paid work during the first six months, while among those with severe consequences from the disease, only 32% returned to work later. Detrimental consequences on financial security and the number of paid hours were also reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both were found to decrease after RTW in a statistically significant manner, dropping by 64% (job involvement) and 59% (job satisfaction). The unique study with a Latin American sample [ 30 ] showed that 44% of the participants returned to paid work during the first six months, while among those with severe consequences from the disease, only 32% returned to work later. Detrimental consequences on financial security and the number of paid hours were also reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of the above, return to work after the sick leave has gradually attracted an increasing amount of attention in the international literature [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. There is currently great interest in understanding the work environment resources which facilitate or hinder the success of these professional transitions since they represent potentially challenging periods in workers’ careers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, while the majority of TBIs sustained in the United States are less severe concussive injuries, these milder events often lead to long-lasting functional impairments (Dean & Sterr, 2013). Likewise, 50-60% of patients experience lasting motor problems poststroke even with rehabilitation, and a comparable percentage require assistance with day-to-day tasks (Nascimento, 2021;Schaechter, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, while the majority of TBIs sustained in the United States are less severe concussive injuries, these milder events often lead to long‐lasting functional impairments (Dean & Sterr, 2013). Likewise, 50–60% of patients experience lasting motor problems poststroke even with rehabilitation, and a comparable percentage require assistance with day‐to‐day tasks (Nascimento, 2021; Schaechter, 2004). In addition to stroke‐related motor impairments, abnormal cognition, including attention and short‐term memory deficits, often persists poststroke and can progress for years after the initial injury (Hochstenbach et al., 2003; Jourdan et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Furthermore, although standardized data collection within the registry with a focus on acute treatment parameters allowed us to analyze an extensive set of patient, stroke and treatment characteristics, it did not allow us to obtain in depth information about patient education and socioeconomic situation or job and enterprise characteristics, which have been identified to also play a role in RTW in stroke patients and might mediate the observed effect. 8,22,23 Therefore, our findings are limited, especially with regard to conclusions about adjustment of job characteristics, reduction in weekly working hours or job change after MT. Also, we did not have data available about employment status beyond the follow-up of 3 months, which could shed light on robustness of predictors over time or differentiate between relevance for early versus long-term vocational rehabilitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%