2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02196.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Progression To Cancer in Barrett's Esophagus: Baseline Histology and Flow Cytometry Identify Low- and High-Risk Patient Subsets

Abstract: A systematic baseline endoscopic biopsy protocol using histology and flow cytometry identifies subsets of patients with Barrett's esophagus at low and high risk for progression to cancer. Patients whose baseline biopsies are negative, indefinite, or low-grade displasia without increased 4N or aneuploidy may have surveillance deferred for up to 5 yr. Patients with cytometric abnormalities merit more frequent surveillance, and management of high-grade dysplasia can be individualized.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
369
2
27

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 383 publications
(412 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
14
369
2
27
Order By: Relevance
“…26,27 Brush cytology may be complementary to endoscopic biopsies, and is recommended by some to be part of the routine endoscopic surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus. 28 Cytology has a good sensitivity for the detection of adenocarcinoma and HGD, as well as a good specificity for intestinal metaplasia without dysplasia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26,27 Brush cytology may be complementary to endoscopic biopsies, and is recommended by some to be part of the routine endoscopic surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus. 28 Cytology has a good sensitivity for the detection of adenocarcinoma and HGD, as well as a good specificity for intestinal metaplasia without dysplasia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 A variety of gains and losses of specific chromosomes and chromosome regions have also been detected in esophageal adenocarcinoma specimens and adjacent mucosa by both traditional cytogenetics and by comparative genomic hybridization. [34][35][36][37][38][39] The studies consistently show an accumulation of chromosomal abnormalities as the histologic changes progress from intestinal metaplasia to dysplasia and carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 Based on careful, prospective observation of a well characterized cohort of patients with Barrett esophagus, it was reported recently that individuals who had baseline esophageal biopsies that showed no dysplasia, indefinite dysplasia, or lowgrade dysplasia and no flow cytometric evidence of aneuploidy were at low risk for disease progression and may have endoscopic surveillance at 5-year intervals. 50 By contrast, biomarkers that are predictive of disease progression in high-risk patients (other than patients with high-grade dysplasia) include aneuploidy (DNA content Ͼ 2.7 N; 4-N fraction Ͼ 6%; or Nuclear only 0 1 2 2 3 1 2 3 2 Nuclear and cytoplasmic 4 7 1 3 3 2 1 3 3 Cytoplasmic only 5 7 2 2 3 2 0 2 0 Negative 11 24 10 25 57 22 9 19 12 GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease-induced esophagitis; EADC, esophageal adenocarcinoma. a Tissue sections were considered positive only if cell nuclear staining was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, among experienced gastrointestinal pathologists, the interobserver discordance for low-grade dysplasia is Ͼ50%; fortunately, disagreement is only Ϸ15% for diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia, and improvements in diagnosis are not necessary (5). Additional markers for dysplasia, such as the presence of aneuploidy on flow cytometry, have been used to help predict patient risk for developing adenocarcinoma (6). However, this laboratory assay is prone to sampling error because dysplasia in Barrett's is usually flat, patchy, and endoscopically invisible (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%