Hypocalcemia may be the only complication precluding a short postoperative hospital stay after total thyroidectomy (1, 2). Much has been written in the literature about the possibility of identifying (using different methods and predictors) which thyroidectomy patients will develop symptomatic hypocalcemia and which will not. Some authors (3-6) consider early postoperative (24-hour) serum calcium levels and intraoperative identification of parathyroid glands to be important predictive factors. Others (7-9) have instead suggested combining intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) and serum calcium measurements, arguing that PTH and serum calcium monitoring after the first postoperative hour would allow reliable prediction of postoperative hypocalcemia. Some authors (10-12) recommend quick PTH assay as a means of predicting postoperative parathyroid function, although others (13) found no overall significant difference in the capacity of intraoperative PTH levels, versus early postoperative serum calcium levels (day 1), to predict long-term hypoparathyroidism. In an attempt to identify reliable predictors of post-operative hypocalcemia, we measured ionized calcium levels before and after surgery and compared the data gathered with total serum calcium levels and symptoms of hypocalcemia (paresthesias and Chvostek's sign). The aim of the present study was to determine whether ionized calcium concentration is a better predictor of post-thyroidectomy hypocalcemia than total serum calcium.