2002
DOI: 10.1093/milmed/167.2.140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Course Completion for the U.S. Army Pharmacy Specialist Course

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine predictors of successful completion of the U.S. Army Medical Department pharmacy specialist (91Q) training program. The sample consisted of 143 students from four course iterations, and only students enrolled in the course for the first time were included for analysis. The relationship between 16 predictor variables and successful completion was assessed. Five variables, the ranks of private (E1) and specialist (E4), cross-trainee status, gender, and Armed Services Vo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Records were received for all 25 participants. Seventeen of the school records contained a standardized test score, twelve from the ACT and five from equivalent standardized tests: Stanford Binet (Thorndike et al, 1986), Differential Aptitude Test (Bennett et al, 1990), Stanford Achievement Test (Kastner et al, 2001), the General Aptitude Test Battery (Bemis, 1968;Williams et al, 1967), and the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (Dunai & Porter, 2001;Meadows, Stanton, Styles, & Finstuen, 2002). All standardized test scores will henceforth be referred to as pre-injury standardized test (PST) scores.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Records were received for all 25 participants. Seventeen of the school records contained a standardized test score, twelve from the ACT and five from equivalent standardized tests: Stanford Binet (Thorndike et al, 1986), Differential Aptitude Test (Bennett et al, 1990), Stanford Achievement Test (Kastner et al, 2001), the General Aptitude Test Battery (Bemis, 1968;Williams et al, 1967), and the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (Dunai & Porter, 2001;Meadows, Stanton, Styles, & Finstuen, 2002). All standardized test scores will henceforth be referred to as pre-injury standardized test (PST) scores.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guided by theoretical empirical findings, this analysis includes 15 independent variables and one dependent variable (Table 2). Variable selection was guided by previous studies examining military factors to academic success and completion of service members in military training programs (Carretta & King, 2008; Dunai & Porter, 2001; Fulton, Starnes, Caouette, Whittaker, & Ivanitskaya, 2008; Grant et al, 2012; Jordon & Curtis, 2010; Meadows, Stanton, Styles, & Finstuen, 2002).…”
Section: Methods and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%