2012
DOI: 10.7205/milmed-d-12-00189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the ASVAB ST Composite Score a Reliable Predictor of First-Attempt Graduation for the U.S. Army Operating Room Specialist Course?

Abstract: The U.S. Army Operating Room Specialist (68D) Course provides first class medical technician training to U.S. Army enlisted soldiers of the Army Medical Command. With a failure rate of approximately 12% over a 2-year period, this study was commissioned to determine whether the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) skilled technical (ST) Score served as a reliable predictor for successful first-attempt completion of the 68D course. A sample size of 373 was analyzed via a multivariate binary logisti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guided by theoretical empirical findings, this analysis includes 15 independent variables and one dependent variable (Table 2). Variable selection was guided by previous studies examining military factors to academic success and completion of service members in military training programs (Carretta & King, 2008; Dunai & Porter, 2001; Fulton, Starnes, Caouette, Whittaker, & Ivanitskaya, 2008; Grant et al, 2012; Jordon & Curtis, 2010; Meadows, Stanton, Styles, & Finstuen, 2002).…”
Section: Methods and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guided by theoretical empirical findings, this analysis includes 15 independent variables and one dependent variable (Table 2). Variable selection was guided by previous studies examining military factors to academic success and completion of service members in military training programs (Carretta & King, 2008; Dunai & Porter, 2001; Fulton, Starnes, Caouette, Whittaker, & Ivanitskaya, 2008; Grant et al, 2012; Jordon & Curtis, 2010; Meadows, Stanton, Styles, & Finstuen, 2002).…”
Section: Methods and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%