2018
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-1500-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive visual search: Role of environmental regularities in the learning of context cues

Abstract: Repeatedly searching through invariant spatial arrangements in visual search displays leads to the buildup of memory about these displays (contextual-cueing effect). In the present study, we investigate (1) whether contextual cueing is influenced by global statistical properties of the task and, if so, (2) whether these properties increase the overall strength (asymptotic level) or the temporal development (speed) of learning. Experiment 1a served as baseline against which we tested the effects of increased or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(79 reference statements)
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further this numerical RT facilitation of the repeated context in the last search epoch was significantly smaller than that in Experiment 1, suggesting low global repetition (1:5) hinders contextual learning. Note similar findings were also observed in our recent study ( Zinchenko et al, in press ) that tested different presentation ratios of repeated displays (20%, 50% vs. 80%) within the same group of participants. That is participants showed significant contextual cueing effect with repetition ratio of 50 and 80% but not of 20%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further this numerical RT facilitation of the repeated context in the last search epoch was significantly smaller than that in Experiment 1, suggesting low global repetition (1:5) hinders contextual learning. Note similar findings were also observed in our recent study ( Zinchenko et al, in press ) that tested different presentation ratios of repeated displays (20%, 50% vs. 80%) within the same group of participants. That is participants showed significant contextual cueing effect with repetition ratio of 50 and 80% but not of 20%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Consequently, the present study with four experiments aimed to investigate whether global repetition formed by the presentation ratio of repeated relative to non-repeated contexts mediates contextual cueing effect. In general, there are three possible methods for manipulating global repetitions in visual search: (1) reducing or increasing the number of repeated (but not non-repeated) displays, (2) changing the number of non-repeated (but not repeated) displays (e.g., Zinchenko et al, in press ) or (3) reducing (or increasing) the number of repeated displays while at the same time increasing (or reducing) non-repeated displays, in order to maintain the total number of displays per block. The former two methods change the total number of trials in an experiment which affect overall experimental time and may require different amount of cognitive resources to complete the whole experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contextual cueing is an important predictive-coding mechanism, helping us to rapidly detect and respond to target objects in recurrent scenes 37 . Prior studies were inconclusive as to whether contextual learning involves an implicit or an explicit memory system, though the balance of evidence suggested a role of consciously accessible memory in contextual cueing 4,10 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viewing distance was 60 cm. Participants placed their fingers (except the thumbs) on the eight solenoid actuators (e.g., Chun & Jiang, 1998, 1999Assumpção et al, 2015;Zellin et al, 2014;Zinchenko, Conci, Müller, & Geyer, 2018), aiming for 85% power to detect a relatively large effect size (f(U) = 0.8) in a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA; η p 2 = 0.4) with an alpha level of .05. Power estimates were computed using G*Power (Erdfelder, Faul, & Buchner, 1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%