Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Electronical, Mechanical and Materials Engineering (ICE2ME 2019) 2019
DOI: 10.2991/ice2me-19.2019.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Modeling of Surface Roughness Based on Response Surface Methodology after WAAM

Abstract: A hybrid technique of additive manufacturing and subtractive process has provided a new solution combining product design and control by software. Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) process wins well-respected because of its low cost and high efficiency of deposition, nevertheless the process has its limitation of high heat input and low forming accuracy. A new process of additive manufacturing with high efficiency of modeling is urgent needed which can control heat transfer, mass transfer and force transf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding roughness value of each process is discussed in [136,137]: it is 4-11 μm Ra for SLM, 15-35 μm Ra for SEBM, 10 μm Ra and 200 μm Ra for LMD, and can be very important for WAAM. Note that models are searched for the prediction of surface roughness (see a list of studies in the introduction of [138]), the optimization of process parameters as well as the roughness minimization (as in [138]) for manufacturing using WAAM and milling.…”
Section: Summary Discussion and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding roughness value of each process is discussed in [136,137]: it is 4-11 μm Ra for SLM, 15-35 μm Ra for SEBM, 10 μm Ra and 200 μm Ra for LMD, and can be very important for WAAM. Note that models are searched for the prediction of surface roughness (see a list of studies in the introduction of [138]), the optimization of process parameters as well as the roughness minimization (as in [138]) for manufacturing using WAAM and milling.…”
Section: Summary Discussion and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding roughness value of each process is discussed in [136,137]: it is 4-11 µ m Ra for SLM, 15-35 µ m Ra for SEBM, 10 µ m Ra and 200 µ m Ra for LMD, and can be very important for WAAM. Note that models are searched for the prediction of surface roughness (see a list of studies in the introduction of [138]), the optimization of process parameters as well as the roughness minimization (as in [138]) for manufacturing using WAAM and milling.…”
Section: Summary Discussion and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since WAAM is an AM method, nishing process are often required and surface roughness can be improved by machining methods such as milling. However in useage areas where surface roughness is an important criterion, it is necessary to optimize the parameters of nishing process or use different methods to improve the surface properties [38,39].…”
Section: Atomic Force Microscopy (Afm)mentioning
confidence: 99%