2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive modeling of glass forming ability in the Fe-Nb-B system using the CALPHAD approach

Abstract: Accurate values needed for the most commonly used indicators of good Glass Forming Ability (GFA) in alloys, i.e. the liquidus (T l ), crystallization (T x ) and glass transition (T g ) temperatures, are only available after successful production of the metallic glass of interest. This has traditionally made discovery of new metallic glasses an expensive and tedious procedure, based on trial-and-error methodology.The present study aims at testing the CALPHAD (Computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The atomic mismatch factor λ has already been used in the Fe-Nb-B ternary system to successfully predict the GFA. [23] Yan et al [24] have compared the critical producible thickness d 2 , max up to d 2,max = 1.5 mm of Fe-based bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) with the atomic mismatch factor λ of seven different Fe-based BMGs with the result that these have an atomic mismatch factor of 0.09 < λ < 0.15. The higher the atomic mismatch factors λ in this range, the higher the maximum thickness d 2 , max that can be produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The atomic mismatch factor λ has already been used in the Fe-Nb-B ternary system to successfully predict the GFA. [23] Yan et al [24] have compared the critical producible thickness d 2 , max up to d 2,max = 1.5 mm of Fe-based bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) with the atomic mismatch factor λ of seven different Fe-based BMGs with the result that these have an atomic mismatch factor of 0.09 < λ < 0.15. The higher the atomic mismatch factors λ in this range, the higher the maximum thickness d 2 , max that can be produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 22 ] While C i represents the molar fraction (mol.%), r i the solute metallic radius (nm), r a the solvent metallic radius (nm), and B to Z the different alloying elements, the atomic mismatch factor λ can be calculated using Equation () λ = i = B Z C i 5extrue| ( r i r normala ) 3 1 5extrue| The atomic mismatch factor λ has already been used in the Fe–Nb–B ternary system to successfully predict the GFA. [ 23 ] Yan et al [ 24 ] have compared the critical producible thickness d 2 , max up to d 2,max = 1.5 mm of Fe‐based bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) with the atomic mismatch factor λ of seven different Fe‐based BMGs with the result that these have an atomic mismatch factor of 0.09 < λ < 0.15. The higher the atomic mismatch factors λ in this range, the higher the maximum thickness d 2 , max that can be produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%