2017 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ram.2017.7889679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive maintenance applications for machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PdM also supports data-driven strategies (Zhang et al, 2019) that can deal with sensible manufacturing and industrial huge information, particularly for acting health perception (e.g., fault diagnosis and remaining life assessment) (Farrar & Worden, 2012). It tends to classify the precise industrial applications supporting six algorithms of ML (Cline et al, 2017) and deep learning (DL), and compare five performance metrics for every classification. The accuracy (a metric to judge the formula performance) of those PdM applications is analyzed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PdM also supports data-driven strategies (Zhang et al, 2019) that can deal with sensible manufacturing and industrial huge information, particularly for acting health perception (e.g., fault diagnosis and remaining life assessment) (Farrar & Worden, 2012). It tends to classify the precise industrial applications supporting six algorithms of ML (Cline et al, 2017) and deep learning (DL), and compare five performance metrics for every classification. The accuracy (a metric to judge the formula performance) of those PdM applications is analyzed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fleet level data is used to learn probability distributions over HC variation. [Cline et al, 2017] review 19 years of inspection data for swivels and valves on oil and gas equipment. Authors noted that they were unable to compute residual life of the majority of components due to the fact that most components never failed.…”
Section: Othermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These failures resulted due to the lack of technology that could support real-time monitoring, data collection, and decision making, but also due to a failure to make real changes in the workplace so that these technologies could be used to the fullest extent possible [14,[16][17][18]. In order to obtain the maximum result from these solutions, radical changes need to be made to the way maintenance is applied in todays' companies [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%