1980
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1980.tb01681.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive animal testing for photocontact allergenicity

Abstract: The purpose of this investigation was to establish a standardized animal model to predict the photoallergenic potential of new chemical compounds. In a first series of experiments the main factors influencing the induction of photoallergenicity were evaluated (induction concentration, pH of the test solution, pretreatment of the irradiation site with sodium lauryl sulphate, additional use of adjuvant injections and routes of administration). Osram Ultravitalux lamps were utilized for these studies. In a second… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive responses elicited by three of the fragrances could not be demonstrated at 50% concentration in the animal assay. Several publications have documented the photoallergic properties of tribromosalicylanilide and tetrachlorosalicylanilide (Maurer et al, 1980;Vinson et al, 1966;Harber et al, 1966). These materials demonstrated in vitro antimicrobial properties and were negative in the guinea pig phototoxic test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive responses elicited by three of the fragrances could not be demonstrated at 50% concentration in the animal assay. Several publications have documented the photoallergic properties of tribromosalicylanilide and tetrachlorosalicylanilide (Maurer et al, 1980;Vinson et al, 1966;Harber et al, 1966). These materials demonstrated in vitro antimicrobial properties and were negative in the guinea pig phototoxic test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study with 19 guinea pigs after induction in the light, no positive reactions were seen after the first provocation (0.1 % intradermal) and only 3 positive reactions after the second (1 % epicutaneous, occlusive); these results indicate a minimal potential for contact sensitization (Maurer et al 1980). …”
Section: Contact Sensitization In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Bithionol is classified as a weak contact photoallergen (Guillot et al 1985, Horio 1976, Maurer et al 1980, Miyachi and Takigawa 1983, Morikawa et al 1974b, Unkovic et al 1988. n.s.…”
Section: Contact Photosensitization In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guinea pigs have generally been used to study allergic contact dermatitis from weak and moderate sensitizers, since they are easier to sensitize than· mice (7). However, 3 techniques have been reported for improving the response of mice to con-tact allergens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%