2007
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2007.4383584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive & Adaptive MPPT Perturb and Observe Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
132
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 377 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
132
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the aim of this paper is not a contribution in relation to the dc-dc stage control, classic cascaded current and voltage loops are considered along with the well known perturb and observe (P&O) algorithm [18], [19] describe the control method and power imbalance compensation technique for the centralized CHB converter.…”
Section: Proposed Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the aim of this paper is not a contribution in relation to the dc-dc stage control, classic cascaded current and voltage loops are considered along with the well known perturb and observe (P&O) algorithm [18], [19] describe the control method and power imbalance compensation technique for the centralized CHB converter.…”
Section: Proposed Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, large perturbation step size increases the steady state oscillations. Hence to improve the performance of P&O, a variable perturbation step size was utilized (Masoum, Dehbonei, & Fuchs, 2002;Femia, Granozio, Petrone, Spagnuolo, & Vitelli, 2007;Pandey, Dasgupta, & Mukerjee, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the P&O algorithm provides high efficiencies if the algorithm parameters are properly designed; however, such design typically depends on the operating point defined by the environmental conditions, which are unpredictable (Femia et al, 2005). Different approaches to optimize the P&O algorithm have been published; for instance, the work in (Femia, Granozio, Petrone, Spagnuolo, & Vitelli, 2007) presents an optimizing of the P&O algorithm using a predictive-adaptive control, where the magnitude of the duty cycle perturbation changes to speed up the tracking the MPP. Similarly, in (Kumar, Student, Kumar, & Senior, 2013), (Piegari & Rizzo, 2010), and (Wang, Wang, & Meng, 2012), adaptive techniques are used to optimize the P&O algorithm with two main objectives: to ensure stability at both transients and steady state, and to improve the tracking speed when the MPP changes due to climatic perturbations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in (Kumar, Student, Kumar, & Senior, 2013), (Piegari & Rizzo, 2010), and (Wang, Wang, & Meng, 2012), adaptive techniques are used to optimize the P&O algorithm with two main objectives: to ensure stability at both transients and steady state, and to improve the tracking speed when the MPP changes due to climatic perturbations. However, the works reported in (Femia et al, 2007), (Kumar et al, 2013), (Piegari & Rizzo, 2010) and (Wang et al, 2012) do not take into account the C b voltage oscillations generated by the inverter; hence, such techniques do not ensure a stable operation of a grid-connected PV system. This paper is focused on the improvement of the tracking speed of the P&O algorithm, whose operation is defined by two parameters: the disturbance period T a and the disturbance magnitude ΔV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%