2022
DOI: 10.1109/tiv.2022.3188662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction-Uncertainty-Aware Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of using data sets or the generated data by driving models is that it can reflect the driving diversity of the human driver, however, it is not easy to demonstrate the interaction between vehicles. [27, 28] are some examples that use generated data or data sets for verification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advantage of using data sets or the generated data by driving models is that it can reflect the driving diversity of the human driver, however, it is not easy to demonstrate the interaction between vehicles. [27, 28] are some examples that use generated data or data sets for verification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of using data sets or the generated data by driving models is that it can reflect the driving diversity of the human driver, however, it is not easy to demonstrate the interaction between vehicles. [27,28] are some examples that use generated data or data sets for verification. The above various verification methods have their advantages and disadvantages, nonetheless, there are hardly any comprehensive verification experiments for a framework, including the verification of the prediction accuracy of dynamic obstacles, the verification of diverse driving behaviors in interactive dynamic scenarios, and the capacity to replan in emergencies, the real-time performance of the algorithm etc.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LSTM model is trained and evaluated on the highD [9] dataset, however, the planning algorithm is evaluated using two selected scenarios from the highD dataset. Tang et al [7] expanded upon this work by estimating the uncertainty of prediction using a deep ensemble technique. Then, the effects of uncertaintyaware prediction on motion planning are evaluated in a single cut-in and merging scenario.…”
Section: B Trajectory Prediction For Motion Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, many existing trajectory prediction approaches lack a thorough analysis of how the learningbased prediction impacts downstream motion planning and control tasks. Even though some studies [5], [6], [7] offer qualitative analysis of motion planning using prediction data, they often fall short of providing a comprehensive comparison between learning-based predictions and conventional methods like the constant velocity prediction model. Additionally, these evaluation methods often neglect to adequately assess the influence of prediction quality in diverse driving conditions, such as high/low traffic densities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zheng [14] has proposed a driving safety field (DSF) to model the risk factors according to the driver-vehicle-road relationships. Tang [15] applied APF to model the uncertainty of collision risk. To address the moving obstacles, researchers [15,16] have integrated APF with model predictive control (MPC) to generate predictive planning results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%