1992
DOI: 10.1080/00423119208969385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Wheel/Rail Interaction: The State-of-the-Art

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model includes additional ballast masses below each sleeper, which are interconnected by springs and dashpots in shear [3]. The contact between the wheel and rail is modeled by non-linear Hertzian spring elements [4].…”
Section: Model Equations and Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model includes additional ballast masses below each sleeper, which are interconnected by springs and dashpots in shear [3]. The contact between the wheel and rail is modeled by non-linear Hertzian spring elements [4].…”
Section: Model Equations and Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where so-called equivalent conicity (Elkins, 1992) has got key significance. Critical velocity obtained in such conditions is often called linear one and denoted v c .…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models utilized linear geometry of wheel-rail contact description based on equivalent conicity (e.g. [8,11]) concept. Recently, the consistent opinion exists that results obtained from linear models may be uncertain to predict features of real object.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%