2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-017-3489-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bifurcation analysis of 4-axle rail vehicle models in a curved track

Abstract: The article presents authors' recent results on nonlinear lateral stability of rail vehicles in a curved track. The theories of self-exciting vibrations and bifurcation are the key elements here. The general objective is presentation of extended use of the earlier worked out authors' method to more complex rail vehicle models. Two 4-axle vehicle models were created. The first one represents coach MKIII described with multibody software by the first author. The second one represents coach 127A described with us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
46
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other geometrical parameters as well as mass and inertial properties of the car body and bogies were taken according to the model from ref. [9]. Those values are consistent with the parameters of rail electric multiple units (EMU) utilized in Poland, therefore the authors consider that proposed rail vehicle model represents realistic constrains of a pantograph on high-speed trains.…”
Section: Multibody Rail Vehicle-pantograph Modelsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other geometrical parameters as well as mass and inertial properties of the car body and bogies were taken according to the model from ref. [9]. Those values are consistent with the parameters of rail electric multiple units (EMU) utilized in Poland, therefore the authors consider that proposed rail vehicle model represents realistic constrains of a pantograph on high-speed trains.…”
Section: Multibody Rail Vehicle-pantograph Modelsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Therefore, it allows us to take into account the most important directions of pantograph excitation from car body (vertical, lateral vibrations and tilt). The model of the rail vehicle was built according to [9]. The parameters of the two-level suspension system in the model are shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Multibody Rail Vehicle-pantograph Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar figures can be found, e.g. in [9][10][11][12] while analogous figures for vehicle motion in CC can be found in [13,14]. In this approach linear v c and nonlinear v n critical velocities are recognised as generally different quantities.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This stop can be caused by unbounded growth of the solution (called sometimes numerical derailment, but not physical one) or arbitrarily by the software operator, e.g. due to unnaturally big velocity values [11,14,15]. As shown, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors used approach applied in the earlier publications, e.g. [12]. This publication shows different values of v n in straight track (ST) and circular curves (CC) and dependence of v n on suspension stiffness parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%