2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jestch.2019.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of tropospheric wet delay by an artificial neural network model based on meteorological and GNSS data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the tropospheric water vapor content is a derivative parameter from zenith wet delay (ZWD) and can be calculated as a function of the refractive index, depending on temperature, pressure and relative humidity [25][26][27]. Selbesoglu [24] claims that the troposphere affects GNSS signals due to the fast variability of the refraction index. Determination of the wet delay is more difficult than the hydrostatic delay due to much faster changes in the water vapor in the troposphere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the tropospheric water vapor content is a derivative parameter from zenith wet delay (ZWD) and can be calculated as a function of the refractive index, depending on temperature, pressure and relative humidity [25][26][27]. Selbesoglu [24] claims that the troposphere affects GNSS signals due to the fast variability of the refraction index. Determination of the wet delay is more difficult than the hydrostatic delay due to much faster changes in the water vapor in the troposphere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, the authors attempt to quantify the effect of solar activity (expressed by sunspots) on satellite navigation signal integrity, using fuzzy logic. However, in order to look at the problem more broadly, attention was also paid to other atmospheric (tropospheric) conditions, and in this case, unlike other research in the literature [24][25][26][27], it was verified whether, against the background of cloudiness, precipitation, humidity, pressure and temperature, solar activity affects the integrity to the greatest extent. Moreover, research usually deals with accuracy rather than signal integrity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Calculate α u (n). e first is the error between the real output and the predicted value [22], and then calculate α u (n) of each node of the error to the result value:…”
Section: Mobile Information Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In climate science, deep learning has recently been applied to a number of different problems, including microphysics (Seifert and Rasp, 2020), radiative transfer (Min et al, 2020), convection (O'Gorman and Dwyer, 2018), forecasting (Roesch and Günther, 2019;Selbesoglu, 2019;Weyn et al, 2019), and empirical-statistical downscaling (Baño-Medina et al, 2020). For example, Yuval et al (2021) have applied deep learning for parametrization of subgrid scale atmospheric processes like convection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%