2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.02.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of the maximal recalescence temperature upon rapid solidification of bulk undercooled Cu70Ni30 alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
16
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the above model predictions are still unsatisfactory as compared with our experimental results for bulk undercooled Cu-Ni alloy [18]. After an analysis of the solute distribution in the quenched grain and a quantitative thermodynamic calculation, we proposed T R for bulk undercooled melts should reach the thermodynamic T 0 point (with no L/S Gibbs energy difference) of the residual liquid [18]. This criterion is compatible with Hindmarsh et al's conclusion that T R should depend on the solute concentration in the remaining liquid [22].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the above model predictions are still unsatisfactory as compared with our experimental results for bulk undercooled Cu-Ni alloy [18]. After an analysis of the solute distribution in the quenched grain and a quantitative thermodynamic calculation, we proposed T R for bulk undercooled melts should reach the thermodynamic T 0 point (with no L/S Gibbs energy difference) of the residual liquid [18]. This criterion is compatible with Hindmarsh et al's conclusion that T R should depend on the solute concentration in the remaining liquid [22].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Later, Vedovato et al reported recalescence in gas atomization should reach a temperature interval between the two cooling lines described by full diffusion and no diffusion in solid [21]. However, the above model predictions are still unsatisfactory as compared with our experimental results for bulk undercooled Cu-Ni alloy [18]. After an analysis of the solute distribution in the quenched grain and a quantitative thermodynamic calculation, we proposed T R for bulk undercooled melts should reach the thermodynamic T 0 point (with no L/S Gibbs energy difference) of the residual liquid [18].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 3 more Smart Citations