2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of survival from carcinoma of oesophagus and oesophago‐gastric junction following surgical resection using an artificial neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of Agrawal study accurate prediction of survival in lung cancer using Ensamble classification model for 6, 9 month and 1-, 2-and 5-years was 73.61%, 74.45%, 76.80%, 85.45% and 91.35% (13). In Modifi study ANN precision in predicting 1-and 3-year survival of esophageal cancer was comparable to other investigations and was 88% and 91.5% respectively (11). As reviewing other previous studies showed, ANN has shown good results in lung, breast and esophageal cancer survival prediction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the basis of Agrawal study accurate prediction of survival in lung cancer using Ensamble classification model for 6, 9 month and 1-, 2-and 5-years was 73.61%, 74.45%, 76.80%, 85.45% and 91.35% (13). In Modifi study ANN precision in predicting 1-and 3-year survival of esophageal cancer was comparable to other investigations and was 88% and 91.5% respectively (11). As reviewing other previous studies showed, ANN has shown good results in lung, breast and esophageal cancer survival prediction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Results show that this system was significantly better than UICC and TNM staging system in predicting 1-and 3-years survival. Consequently results of this study shows that ANN is superior to UICC and TNM staging in predicting survival in esophageal carcinoma and could be a valuable tool in the management of esophageal cancer patients (11). In another article which aims to predict lung cancer survival with the use of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) database.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most include pathological information gained from tumour resection and these data cannot be used at the time of diagnosis to inform management. Other prognostic studies have used sophisticated novel molecular techniques to determine prognosis, for example DNA microarray 42 , or involved the development of complex computer models, such as artificial neural networks, for which extensive clinical, investigative and pathological information is required to estimate prognosis 43 . A study in patients with inoperable oesophagogastric cancer devised an inflammation-based prognostic scoring system 36 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resection was designated R0 when both macroscopic and microscopic complete clearance was achieved [8].…”
Section: Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%