2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of shape distortions. Part II. Experimental validation and analysis of boundary conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of the coefficient of linear thermal expansion in rubbery state is approximately 2.5 times larger than that in glassy state [17]:…”
Section: Stress-strain Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of the coefficient of linear thermal expansion in rubbery state is approximately 2.5 times larger than that in glassy state [17]:…”
Section: Stress-strain Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The glassy state properties can be calculated based on the assumptions: the shear modulus in glassy state, G g m , is approximately 100 times that in the rubbery state, G r m [17]:…”
Section: Relation Between Materials Modulus and Segment Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aluminium or steel tools have a much higher expansion coefficients than composite parts, and tend to stretch the parts as they heat up. This can happen as a result of small shear stresses at the tool interface causing tension in the part [2,3,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. The AGP (After Gel Point) plays a significant role on the magnitude of process-induced residual stresses, as demonstrate in the works [15][16][17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors are known to have significant effects on the final residual stresses in PMCs [3,4]. To capture the influence of these factors, a variety of revised cure-dependent elastic models have been proposed [4][5][6][7], such as a path dependent constitutive model [4,5] and the cure-hardening, instantaneous linear elastic (CHILE) model [7]. However, these models, do not consider stress relaxation during the cooling process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%