2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0928-8937(02)80006-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of sealing capacity by the equivalent grain size method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Correspondingly, the breakthrough median pressures in the WF-LM1 (58–81 MPa) and LM2-LM3 (80–90 MPa) members show a similar rule compared with that for the breakthrough pressure (Figure c). The capacities of caprocks to seal hydrocarbons depended on the sizes of the pore throats within the interconnected pore system that the leaking hydrocarbons would penetrate. ,, Lash (2006) concluded that the median pore throat diameter negatively correlated with sealing capacity in shale samples. Therefore, the breakthrough radius and medium radius can reflect the maximum pore throat of hydrocarbon breakthrough a seal rock, the smaller the pore throat was, the stronger the sealing ability was .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondingly, the breakthrough median pressures in the WF-LM1 (58–81 MPa) and LM2-LM3 (80–90 MPa) members show a similar rule compared with that for the breakthrough pressure (Figure c). The capacities of caprocks to seal hydrocarbons depended on the sizes of the pore throats within the interconnected pore system that the leaking hydrocarbons would penetrate. ,, Lash (2006) concluded that the median pore throat diameter negatively correlated with sealing capacity in shale samples. Therefore, the breakthrough radius and medium radius can reflect the maximum pore throat of hydrocarbon breakthrough a seal rock, the smaller the pore throat was, the stronger the sealing ability was .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grainsize-based approach to estimate permeability and capillary seal capacity of intra-delta mudstones involves a number of assumptions and approximations that introduce uncertainty in the calculation results. Probably the main uncertainty is in the use of the equivalent grain size method of Nakayama and Sato (2002) to calculate pore throats (Ten Veen et al, 2013). Knowing that capillary seal capacity is a multi-scale property, and that mudstones also act as permeability seals and faulting and fracture zones crossing the mudstones influence the seal capacity, the grainsize-based method should be seen as a first phase of a more comprehensive approach to estimate preserved gas columns in bright spots in the SNS delta (Ten Veen et al, 2013;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These equations were developed by Aplin (2004, 2010) for calculating mudstone porosity and permeability, respectively. The pore throats are calculated from approaches that use the calculated porosities and median grain size, based on equations published by Nakayama and Sato (2002). Knowing the pore throats, the sealing capacity could be determined by estimating the water densities from WFT pressure measurements, and gas densities and gas-water interfacial tensions from established relations using known temperature and pressure changes with depth (NIST Chemistry WebBook: http:// webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/fluid/; Nordgård Bolås et al, 2005, respectively).…”
Section: Entrapment and Sealsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trap) (Nakayama and Sato, 2002;Sawamura and Nakayama, 2005)においては,集積され得 A1 STEP 1: Estimation of pseudo-regional trend under abnormally high pressure condition. Pseudo-regional gas/oil/water trends are drawn from observed pressure data for each phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%