2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2015.06.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of proton cross sections for SEU in SRAMs and SDRAMs using the METIS engineer tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, the SEU cross-section results are compared with the experimental data obtained from the literature [27,[32][33][34]. It is important to note that no fitting of the results was performed.…”
Section: Experimental Data Vs Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the SEU cross-section results are compared with the experimental data obtained from the literature [27,[32][33][34]. It is important to note that no fitting of the results was performed.…”
Section: Experimental Data Vs Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total SET rate estimated with OMERE [17] for each circuit and its hardened version for the LEO (800km, 98°) and ISS (400km, 51.64°) orbit considering heavy ions and protons. Proton-induced SET rates are estimated with the METIS method [18,19]. The SET cross section average of each input signal is used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the in-orbit SET rates are predicted with OMERE package [17] for heavy ions and protons in Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) and International Space Station (ISS) orbits. Proton-induced SET rates are calculated from the heavy ion data using the METIS method [18,19]. Besides exploiting the transistor folding technique, the novelty of this work also lays on the usage of transistor folding with split in the active area of the transistors on different combinational logic gates to reduce area overhead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, previous studies have reported non-negligible contributions from thermal neutrons [1,17,19]. Protons have also been found to cause soft errors [13,20]. Therefore, we evaluated four secondary particles as contributors to the soft errors, including thermal neutrons (1-0.5 eV), intermediate-energy neutrons (0.5 eV-10 MeV), high-energy neutrons (10 MeV), and protons.…”
Section: Classification Of Secondary Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%