2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of protein submitochondria locations based on data fusion of various features of sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(116 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arguably the best assessment of progress in this field is offered by the CASP project (http:// predictioncenter.org/). A summary of extensive research efforts in the area of protein folding may also be found in Chou and Zhang (1995), Chou and Shen(2008) and Zakeri et al (2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably the best assessment of progress in this field is offered by the CASP project (http:// predictioncenter.org/). A summary of extensive research efforts in the area of protein folding may also be found in Chou and Zhang (1995), Chou and Shen(2008) and Zakeri et al (2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A protein sequence can be summarized by its known functional domains. This representative model for a protein sequence was first introduced in (Cai et al, 2002, 2003) and is also considered for protein fold classification (Shen and Chou, 2009), protein structural recognition (Chou and Cai, 2004), protein subcellular location prediction (Cai et al, 2002) and prediction of protein submitochondria locations (Zakeri et al, 2011). In fact, fold information is a useful clue in determining a protein’s tertiary structure, which can facilitate the identification of its function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as elucidated by Chou and Shen (2008) and demonstrated in Chou and Shen (2007), among the three cross-validation methods, the jackknife test is deemed the most objective one (Feng 2002) and can always yield a unique result for a given benchmark data set; hence, it has been increasingly used by investigators to examine the accuracy of various predictors (Zhou 1998;Zhou and Assa-Munt 2001;Zhou and Doctor 2003;Zhou et al 2007;Jiang et al 2008a, b;Li and Li 2008b;Lin 2008;Lin et al 2008;Zhang and Fang 2008;Bi et al 2011;Ding et al 2011;Hayat and Khan 2011;Hu et al 2011;Joshi and Sekharan 2010;Kandaswamy et al 2010;Kandaswamy et al 2011;Lin and Ding 2011;Liu et al 2010;Zakeri et al 2011). During the jackknife test process, each protein is singled out in turn as a test sample; the remaining proteins are used as a training set to calculate the test sample's membership and predict the class.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%