1997
DOI: 10.2514/2.5235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Pressurant Mass Requirements for Axisymmetric Liquid Hydrogen Tanks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later work presented in one study 82 provides enhancements to the collapse factor correlation described above. These enhancements include:…”
Section: Semi-empirical Curve-fit Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Later work presented in one study 82 provides enhancements to the collapse factor correlation described above. These enhancements include:…”
Section: Semi-empirical Curve-fit Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…82 investigated the effects of mass transfer between cryogenic liquid propellant and ullage gas. The study concluded that evaporated propellant into the ullage gas region must be less than 26% of the total mass of pressurant gas supplied to the tank for the collapse factor correlation to be valid.…”
Section: Semi-empirical Curve-fit Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally speaking, the pressurizing gas should not condense or be soluble into the liquid propellants and, thus, the helium gas would be the best choice for pressurizing the propellant tanks. In this way, the pressurization system controls the gas pressure in the gas space of the propellant tanks or ullage and maintains this ullage at a predetermined pressure required by propellant and structural requirements of tanks [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation to predict the total required pressurant mass for an axisymmetric propellant tank was developed by Epstein and Anderson [3] in 1968 based on the concept of the collapse factor. Then it was revised by Van Dresar [4] in 1997 by comparing with test data obtained from spherical propellant tanks and including the concept of equivalent diameter. However, this correlation had the disadvantage of not being able to predict the pressurant mass flow rate with time during propellant outflow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%