2018
DOI: 10.1590/1983-21252018v31n301rc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Phenotypic and Genotypic Values by Blup/GWS and Neural Networks

Abstract: Genome-wide selection (GWS) uses simultaneously the effect of the thousands markers covering the entire genome to predict genomic breeding values for individuals under selection. The possible benefits of GWS are the reduction of the breeding cycle, increase in gains per unit of time, and decrease of costs. However, the success of the GWS is dependent on the choice of the method to predict the effects of markers. Thus, the objective of this work was to predict genomic breeding values (GEBV) through artificial n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The adverse effect of lower heritability on selective accuracy in several scenarios has been proven in previous studies that used the RR‐BLUP (Coutinho et al., 2018; Moura et al., 2019), BayesB methods (Moura et al., 2019), BO (Ghafouri‐Kesbi et al., 2017), RF (Ghafouri‐Kesbi et al., 2017), RBF (Sant'Anna et al., 2020), and MLP methods (Coutinho et al., 2018). Guo et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The adverse effect of lower heritability on selective accuracy in several scenarios has been proven in previous studies that used the RR‐BLUP (Coutinho et al., 2018; Moura et al., 2019), BayesB methods (Moura et al., 2019), BO (Ghafouri‐Kesbi et al., 2017), RF (Ghafouri‐Kesbi et al., 2017), RBF (Sant'Anna et al., 2020), and MLP methods (Coutinho et al., 2018). Guo et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The importance of ANN in genetic improvement is confirmed in other studies. Coutinho et al [44], by means of simulated data, compared the prediction methods by ANN and RR-BLUP /GS using correlations between the phenotypic value and genotypic value with the genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV). The results showed superiority of ANN in the prediction of GEBVs in the scenarios with higher and lower density of markers, parallel to higher levels of linkage disequilibrium and greater heritability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estudos com dados simulados mostram que progênies com maiores laços de 570 parentesco e menor número efetivo aumentam a acurácia da seleção; além de demonstrarem que em condições de altos desequilíbrio de ligação e herdabilidade, a densidade de marcadores tem menor influência na capacidade de predição (COUTINHO et al, 2018;VALENTE et al, 2016). Quanto aos métodos de predição, o RR-BLUP (Ridge Regression-Best Linear Unbiased Prediction), de forma geral, é superior ao método bayesiano (Blasso), porém em condições de alta herdabilidade e alto desequilíbrio de ligação, o método baseado em redes neurais demonstra superioridade em relação ao RR-BLUP, indicando diferença de modelos quantos aos pressupostos associados à característica estudada (ALMEIDA et al, 2016;COUTINHO et al, 2018).…”
Section: Seleção Genômicaunclassified