2012
DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.111.966531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Optimal Deployment Projection for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Abstract: Background-Identifying the optimal fluoroscopic projection of the aortic valve is important for successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Various imaging modalities, including multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), have been proposed for prediction of the optimal deployment projection. We evaluated a method that provides 3-dimensional angiographic reconstructions (3DA) of the aortic root for prediction of the optimal deployment angle and compared it with MDCT. Methods and Results-Forty patie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[22][23][24][25] Consequently, a reduction in peri-and post-interventional complications such as device malpositioning, paravalvular leakage, trauma of surrounding structures as well as other organ damage (acute kidney failure) was shown. 22,24 Excellent implant angles determined by Aortic Valve Guide are significantly more likely to be associated with no paravalvular regurgitation compared to satisfactory or poor implant angles (41.3% vs. 21.6%, respectively, p = 0.045) independent of operator experience.…”
Section: Different Implementations For Aortic Valve Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24][25] Consequently, a reduction in peri-and post-interventional complications such as device malpositioning, paravalvular leakage, trauma of surrounding structures as well as other organ damage (acute kidney failure) was shown. 22,24 Excellent implant angles determined by Aortic Valve Guide are significantly more likely to be associated with no paravalvular regurgitation compared to satisfactory or poor implant angles (41.3% vs. 21.6%, respectively, p = 0.045) independent of operator experience.…”
Section: Different Implementations For Aortic Valve Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annular measurements by cardiac CTA have resulted in lower rates of paravalvular AI, a major determinant of short-and long-term outcomes (13,14,20). Measurements of annular perimeter tend to yield the lower interobserver variability (10) and larger diameters than annular area or the mean of the major and minor diameters (16,21).…”
Section: Preoperative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This deployment angle requires multiple "trial-and-error" aortograms with repositioning of the fluoroscopy arm until an adequate 3-cusp view is seen, but can be predicted with cardiac CTA. Cardiac CTA guided determination of the deployment angle may reduce procedure time, contrast volume, and radiation exposure, with improvements in the rate of correct fluoroscopic projections at the time of TAVR and improved outcomes (16,20,26) (Figure 7). A B C D …”
Section: (Tables 34)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). 2 From the femoral artery, with use of a 6F multipurpose angiographic catheter (Boston Scientific Corporation; Natick, Mass), we easily passed a straight-tipped, hydrophilic Radifocus ® Glidewire ® Advantage Peripheral Guidewire (Terumo Interventional Systems; Tokyo, Japan) retrograde from the aorta to the LV, through the PVL; however, the catheter would not cross the defect. A 4F Glidecath ® hydrophilic Coated Catheter (Terumo) was able to cross over this wire, and through that catheter we shuttled an Amplatz Super Stiff  Guidewire (Boston Scientific) across the defect into the LV.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%