2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.102927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of mechanical properties of rail pads under in-service conditions through machine learning algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, a friendly application accessible for any user could be developed. This approach has been used by one of the authors of this paper in a recent contribution [30] where an application was created on the Microsoft.Net platform.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, a friendly application accessible for any user could be developed. This approach has been used by one of the authors of this paper in a recent contribution [30] where an application was created on the Microsoft.Net platform.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, without much programming intervention, Microsoft developed a module in Power BI reporting tool called Influencer Visual based on the ML.NET framework, a predictive machine learning model using the Gradient Boosting algorithm called MART [25]. The algorithm employed was an efficient implementation and show promising results in the mechanical prediction [26] and error compensation [27]. Based on the Google Scholar search, the application of ML.NET into the customer service industry for customer intent prediction is not available.…”
Section: ) Customer Intent Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, machine learning methods have had many applications in track defect identification and prediction. Machine learning methods were used to detect defects of important components of the track structure that are directly related to safe train operation, including the defects of rails [39,40], fasteners [41][42][43][44], rail pads [45], and turnout [46]. The classification of three types of rail defects-surface defect, cross level defect and depression in track profiles-by track geometry data on the basis of logistic regression and decision tree [39] and the classification of rail crack by acoustic emission waves on the basis of a multibranch convolutional neural network (CNN) [40] were explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rail fastener defects were detected from images on the basis of a CNN [41], generative adversarial network, residual network [42], point cloud deep learning [43], and Faster region-CNN [44]. The dynamic stiffness of rail pads was predicted using several machine learning methodologies (multilinear regression, K nearest neighbors, regression tree, random forest, gradient boosting, multilayer perceptron, and support vector machine (SVM)) [45]. The fault detection approach for the HSR turnout based on a deep denoising auto-encoder and one-class SVM [46] was also proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%