2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.02.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of hydrogen production by magnetic field effect water electrolysis using artificial neural network predictive models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method transforms every categorical data into a column, and the presence and absence are respectively indicated with 1 and 0 values. Thanks to one-hot encoding, models understand the dataset better and perform better [12]. Another pre-processing technique that was applied to the dataset was normalization.…”
Section: Feature Extraction and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method transforms every categorical data into a column, and the presence and absence are respectively indicated with 1 and 0 values. Thanks to one-hot encoding, models understand the dataset better and perform better [12]. Another pre-processing technique that was applied to the dataset was normalization.…”
Section: Feature Extraction and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, as in many different fields, there has been a great interest in machine learning (ML) to optimize the operating conditions of the gasification system. Regression analysis, artificial neural networks (ANN) [11,12], tree-based approaches like classification and random forest (RF) [13] based on regression trees (RT) and extreme trees, and support vector machines (SVM) [14] are frequently supported when modeling hydrogen generation processes from biomass [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 18 Due to the advanced genetic algorithm coupled with neurons and hidden layers in the ANN, it can compute and train even with many experimentally obtained nonlinear data. 17 Thus, the predictive analytical outcome from ANN was generally more refined and accurate than RSM. Both models can be applied in several scientific domains to use experimental data to determine the functional relationships between the process's input variables and their output response variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 16 An ANN approach was successfully implemented in magnetic field-influenced water electrolysis to predict the hydrogen evaluation with a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.0112 and a correlation coefficient of 0.97. 17 An optimized numerical matrix can be formulated without any assumptions by RSM predicting the best possible outcome. By considering interactions among different numbers and sets of influential variables, RSM works with fewer experimental trials for validation, unlike ANN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%