2020 4th International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icicos51170.2020.9299011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Hotel Booking Cancellation using CRISP-DM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Saputro and Nanang (2021) conducted HOCP using random forest (RF) and extra tree classifiers and identified 79% of all hospitality order cancellers. Andriawan et al (2020) found that RF is more accurate in HOCP than XGBoost, CatBoost and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) in HOCP. Satu et al (2020) compared the classification accuracy of XGBoost, gradient boosting, RF, decision tree, LR, KNN and Gaussian Naive Bayes classifier (GNBC) in terms of statistical indicators.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Saputro and Nanang (2021) conducted HOCP using random forest (RF) and extra tree classifiers and identified 79% of all hospitality order cancellers. Andriawan et al (2020) found that RF is more accurate in HOCP than XGBoost, CatBoost and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) in HOCP. Satu et al (2020) compared the classification accuracy of XGBoost, gradient boosting, RF, decision tree, LR, KNN and Gaussian Naive Bayes classifier (GNBC) in terms of statistical indicators.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…conducted HOCP using logistic regression (LR), k-nearest neighbor (KNN) and categorical boosting (CatBoost) and found that CatBoost can obtain higher prediction accuracy than LR and KNN Saputro and Nanang (2021). conducted HOCP using random forest (RF) and extra tree classifiers and identified 79% of all hospitality order cancellers Andriawan et al (2020). found that RF is more accurate in HOCP than XGBoost, CatBoost and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) in HOCP Satu et al (2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a study presented the use of a machine learning approach to predict the likelihood of a hotel booking cancellation using the CRISP-DM method. The method is useful for gaining a thorough understanding of the data and in assisting the hotel industry in determining which transactions will be cancelled soon [29]. The study proposed that "lead-time" would be an important variable that would play a role in booking cancellation.…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the Data Understanding stage, we collect and analyze data to identify information and assess its quality. This helps you figure out the percentage of data we'll analyze, including the amount to retrieve and the data that's stuck or running smoothly [7].…”
Section: Data Understandingmentioning
confidence: 99%