2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of frequency response function (FRF) of asymmetric tools from the analytical coupling of spindle and beam models of holder and tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature provides several approaches for identifying joint parameters. Some of them are: manual or visual tuning of parameters [13,21], parameter variation [1] and curve fitting or non-linear optimization [9,15]. The objective function for these approaches has been to reduce the difference between the predicted and measured amplitudes within a frequency range.…”
Section: Joint Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Literature provides several approaches for identifying joint parameters. Some of them are: manual or visual tuning of parameters [13,21], parameter variation [1] and curve fitting or non-linear optimization [9,15]. The objective function for these approaches has been to reduce the difference between the predicted and measured amplitudes within a frequency range.…”
Section: Joint Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was observed that the amplitude of the resonance frequencies in this state is extremely sensitive to the quality of impact and measurement setup such that a consistent estimation of joint damping was not possible. Hence, literature values for joint damping [13] were used as starting values in this study and adjusted manually. Taking these values and the identified joint stiffness, the one-segment beam was elastically coupled with the holder.…”
Section: Joint Identification and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The analytical approximation of flute geometry is further used by Mancisidor et al [15], where a new Timoshenko beam model was proposed by use of the fixed boundaries approach as opposed to the use of free-free response of the cutting tool body. Then, Ozsahin and Altintas [16] studied the tool tip FRF prediction for tools having asymmetrical geometry such as 2-fluted ones. They showed the effect of cutting flute geometry on the FRF for asymmetrical tools in two orthogonal directions, i.e., x and y.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%