2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.04.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of crystallographic cracking planes in single-crystal nickel-base superalloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calibration parameter necessary to predict the correct crystallographic cracking plane after a transition from Mode I cracking, as described in [14], was initially set to a value of 0.1 based on experimental results. In the referenced study, the RSIF was calculated along a Mode I crack and not along crystallographic crack fronts as in the current study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calibration parameter necessary to predict the correct crystallographic cracking plane after a transition from Mode I cracking, as described in [14], was initially set to a value of 0.1 based on experimental results. In the referenced study, the RSIF was calculated along a Mode I crack and not along crystallographic crack fronts as in the current study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The superscript denotes that the stress tensor is scaled to account for Burgers' direction from which the crack front is approached, which does not necessarily lie in the plane orthogonal to the crack front. Further information and the definition of the tensor ′ is given in the submitted manuscript by Busse et al [14].…”
Section: The Equivalent Rsifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fatigue crack growth experiments were performed according to the test conditions shown in Table 2. Further details of the experimental procedure can be found in [25]. Note…”
Section: Materials and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modelling and test data evaluation for crystallographic crack growth is more complex than for Mode I crack growth. A crack driving force parameter for crystallographic crack growth has recently been proposed by Busse et al 40,41 .…”
Section: Crystallographic Crack Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%