1976
DOI: 10.1021/ac60365a022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of continuum intensity in energy-dispersive x-ray microanalysis

Abstract: LITERATURE CITEDMore detailed discussion of the -ray interferences is given in earlier work (78).3) As already mentioned above, the possibilities of nuclear interferences are few at 10 MeV. It may be seen in column 3, Table I, that the only interference is between Li and B, 7Be is produced by 7Li(p,n)7Be and by 10B(p,o:)7Be.No other interference was detected by direct -ray spectrometry of elements irradiated at 10 MeV. With chemical separations, it would probably be possible to observe some ( , ) reactions on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination resulted in the distribution reproduced as figure 46. Apparently, the distribution of characteristic and continuum x-rays of like energy is similar-not an altogether surprising result. 41 The study of the continuum distribution would be useful in studying background effects in energy dispersive x-ray detectors [41]. Monte Carlo calculations of this distribution might also be useful for analytical situations in which a small quantity of heavy material (high atomic number) resides in a light (low atomic number) matrix.…”
Section: Agreement With Experimental Results Was Very Good (Fig 43)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combination resulted in the distribution reproduced as figure 46. Apparently, the distribution of characteristic and continuum x-rays of like energy is similar-not an altogether surprising result. 41 The study of the continuum distribution would be useful in studying background effects in energy dispersive x-ray detectors [41]. Monte Carlo calculations of this distribution might also be useful for analytical situations in which a small quantity of heavy material (high atomic number) resides in a light (low atomic number) matrix.…”
Section: Agreement With Experimental Results Was Very Good (Fig 43)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far as f(x) vs x curves derived from Monte Carlo methods are concerned, Duncumb compared Monte Carlo results for Cu-Ka with those calculated by the Phi 1 i bert-DuncumbHeinrich relation [25]; results are shown in figure 41. This figure indicates the effect of tilt on the result as well thus illustrating the potential value of the Monte Carlo method in dealing with a wide variety of experimental arrangements.…”
Section: Distribution Of X-ray Signals By Monte Carlo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their number and energy distribution as a function of Z can be measured experimentally with a good degree of accuracy. The back scattered electron fraction T/ is given by (12) where ib is the incident beam current and is is the current measured through the specimen. Measurements of T/ by Bishop(36) and Heinrich (37) Igure .…”
Section: Electron Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of T/* can be determined easily if consecutive sample current measurements of the sample and a standard of known T/ are made at the same time the x-ray data are taken. From the definition of T/ in equation (12) and the fact that the beam current ib is the same for the two measurements, it follows that (47) With reasonably stable equipment, T/ * can be measured routinely to a precision of ±0.0l.…”
Section: Substrate Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estes dispositivos baseados no fenômeno de reflexão total consistem em finos tubos capilares dentro dos quais os feixes de raios X se propagam, refletindo-se totalmente sobre as paredes internas, sem sofrer atenuação ou dispersão. Estas são as microssondas de raios X que permitem análises de alta resolução espacial, da ordem de µm (FIORI et al, 1976;KUCZUMOW et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified