2006
DOI: 10.1021/ci060003g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Biological Targets for Compounds Using Multiple-Category Bayesian Models Trained on Chemogenomics Databases

Abstract: Target identification is a critical step following the discovery of small molecules that elicit a biological phenotype. The present work seeks to provide an in silico correlate of experimental target fishing technologies in order to rapidly fish out potential targets for compounds on the basis of chemical structure alone. A multiple-category Laplacian-modified naïve Bayesian model was trained on extended-connectivity fingerprints of compounds from 964 target classes in the WOMBAT (World Of Molecular BioAcTivit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
125
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
125
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Naïve Bayes is a commonly applied stochastic classifier based on the Bayes theorem of conditional probability (Nidhi et al, 2006). The major characteristic of the classifier is the naïve assumption that all input features are independent.…”
Section: Naïve Bayes Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naïve Bayes is a commonly applied stochastic classifier based on the Bayes theorem of conditional probability (Nidhi et al, 2006). The major characteristic of the classifier is the naïve assumption that all input features are independent.…”
Section: Naïve Bayes Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian classification has been applied in many studies and was recently compared with other machine-learning techniques. [18][19][20][21] To classify promiscuous from selective compounds, we used the Bayesian modeling protocol available in Pipeline Pilot (SciTegic). [26] A large number of models were built using different sets of descriptors.…”
Section: Naïve Bayesian (Nb) Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However Bayesian analysis appears notably absent in routine published practice (Klon, 2009;Nidhi et al, 2006). Computational limitations seem less likely than the poor understanding surrounding the use of these methods.…”
Section: How Actionable Is Your Approach?mentioning
confidence: 99%