1998
DOI: 10.1038/4362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of antisense oligonucleotide efficacy by in vitro methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to filling this void, we are working toward addressing the question of whether high affinity binding in cell free assays corresponds to high affinity binding within a living cell. In the few cases where extensive comparison has been made, agreement between in vitro experiments and intracellular data suggests that binding affinity is a useful predictor of antisense activity (Matveeva et al, 1998). The computational strategy described here provides a convenient, inexpensive method for selecting candidate oligonucleotides to guide further exploration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In addition to filling this void, we are working toward addressing the question of whether high affinity binding in cell free assays corresponds to high affinity binding within a living cell. In the few cases where extensive comparison has been made, agreement between in vitro experiments and intracellular data suggests that binding affinity is a useful predictor of antisense activity (Matveeva et al, 1998). The computational strategy described here provides a convenient, inexpensive method for selecting candidate oligonucleotides to guide further exploration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…These results are consistent with the fact that not every ASO perfectly matched to an intended transcript reduces that transcript. This observation has been explained by differences in RNA accessibility due to secondary structure, protein binding, or processing kinetics [52][53][54]. Thus, a target site in an unintended transcript may be less accessible than that in the intended transcript or the unintended transcript itself may be less available for antisense targeting.…”
Section: Mismatches In the Gap Were More Likely To Be Selectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matveeva et al [86] reported an RNase H-based strategy for mapping RNAs which employs a pool of DNA fragments complementary to the target rather than a complete library of oligonucleotides. They determined accessible sites on c-raf mRNA for which cellular data on the antisense activity of several oligonucleotides were available [34].…”
Section: Digested Template Library Combined With Rnase Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matveeva et al [92] described a statistical evaluation of the degree of correlation between data of in vitro assays that measure human c-raf mRNA regional accessibility to ASOs and levels of intracellular mRNA reduction produced by these ASOs. Data generated with RNase H mapping [86] and gel-mobility shift assays [78,106] were used for the calculation of correlation coefficients.…”
Section: Correlation Between In Vitro Accessibility and Intracellularmentioning
confidence: 99%