1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(19991005)65:1<1::aid-bit1>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of antisense oligonucleotide binding affinity to a structured RNA target

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
30
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possibility is that the energy values used in RNA folding calculations, obtained from in vitro experiments, were systematically overestimated. In fact, in a few studies in which the results of RNA folding calculations can be compared directly to in vivo activities studied (46)(47)(48), a systematic two-to threefold overestimation of RNA binding energies has been reported. This may account for the discrepancies we observed, because the differences in the slopes of the dotted and solid lines in Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Another possibility is that the energy values used in RNA folding calculations, obtained from in vitro experiments, were systematically overestimated. In fact, in a few studies in which the results of RNA folding calculations can be compared directly to in vivo activities studied (46)(47)(48), a systematic two-to threefold overestimation of RNA binding energies has been reported. This may account for the discrepancies we observed, because the differences in the slopes of the dotted and solid lines in Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For example, a thermodynamic cycle equivalent to our calculation of DG bind predicted antisense oligonucleotides with high binding affinity for rabbit b-globin and mouse tumor necrosis factor-a mRNAs, achieving 60% accuracy and a significant correlation with experimental data (Walton et al 1999). Analogous calculations included the concentration-dependent effects of oligonucleotide dimerization, predicting oligonucleotide-target affinities consistent with results from an RNase-H mapping assay on the AT 1 receptor mRNA and from a trans-tagging assay on sickle b-globin mRNA (Mathews et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One recurring theme is the use of RNA secondary structure prediction algorithms to calculate the free energy changes, DG bind , associated with binding an oligonucleotide to each possible target site on the mRNA substrate. Target sites with strongly negative values of DG bind are then predicted to be the most accessible sites on the substrate (Mathews et al 1999;Walton et al 1999;Busch et al 2008;Lu and Mathews 2008;Tafer et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanistically, an oligonucleotide hybridizes with a target strand (forms antiparallel base-paired duplex), thereby affecting its natural folding and interaction with cognate partners or recruiting intracellular machinery that cleaves the RNA (Bennett and Swayze, 2010). Such interaction, however, depends on the thermodynamic and kinetic barrier of unfolding the native conformation of both the target RNA and the antisense oligonucleotide (Freier et al, 1986; Mir and Southern, 1999; Walton et al, 1999), which can be prohibitively high (Li et al, 2008). Although there are RNA-binding proteins that facilitate RNA unfolding, the antisense-based strategy is still mostly applicable to non-structured or weakly structured RNAs.…”
Section: Brief Overview Of Rna Structurementioning
confidence: 99%