2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-022-01583-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction and recommendation by machine learning through repetitive internal validation for hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and early death after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diverse machine learning tools that [ 21 ] use to perform automated prediction in test cases, include logistic regression; Naïve Bayes; bagging techniques such as Random Forest; and boosting techniques such as Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and Adaboost. Of these, XGBoost was noted to achieve optimal accuracy of prediction.…”
Section: Our Work In the Context Of Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The diverse machine learning tools that [ 21 ] use to perform automated prediction in test cases, include logistic regression; Naïve Bayes; bagging techniques such as Random Forest; and boosting techniques such as Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and Adaboost. Of these, XGBoost was noted to achieve optimal accuracy of prediction.…”
Section: Our Work In the Context Of Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In lieu of an objective score for VOD onset and development, it may appear possible to undertake the learning of the pattern in the data collected from a retrospective set of bone-marrow transplant recipients, whose sufferance of VOD has been identified using a given model or interpretation of severity categorisation. We will need to review such attempts at using standard machine learning (ML) tools, [ 21 ], in the context of the question that Haematologist-Oncologists’ fundamentally desire an answer to, at the pre-transplant stage, namely: “how severely will VOD develop in a prospective patient?”. The efficacy of the reported ML tools in providing a reliable and explainable (and preferably continuous-valued) quantification of the virulence of VOD progression in the prospective patient will need to be reviewed, against any “black boxed” facility that lacks interpretability; lacks generalisability—to other implementation of VOD mitigation and HSCT protocol parameters—in spite of the large sample size, (as flagged up in the critical review by [ 22 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation