2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction and optimization of wave energy converter arrays using a machine learning approach

Abstract: a b s t r a c tOptimization of the layouts of arrays of wave energy converters (WECs) is a challenging problem. The hydrodynamic analysis and performance estimation of such systems are performed using semi-analytical and numerical models such as the boundary element method. However, the analysis of an array of such converters becomes computationally expensive, and the computational time increases rapidly with the number of devices in the system. As such determination of optimal layouts of WECs in arrays become… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We optimized layouts for 40 WECs under different constraints, but the approach would work equally well for even larger arrays. The performance of arrays of Oyster WECs has been evaluated for the most probable sea-state at the Isle of Lewis in Scotland [43, 50] —see Sect. 4 on wave climate.
Fig.
…”
Section: Arrays Of Wave Energy Convertersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We optimized layouts for 40 WECs under different constraints, but the approach would work equally well for even larger arrays. The performance of arrays of Oyster WECs has been evaluated for the most probable sea-state at the Isle of Lewis in Scotland [43, 50] —see Sect. 4 on wave climate.
Fig.
…”
Section: Arrays Of Wave Energy Convertersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…modes (De Chowdhury and Manasseh, 2017;Wolgamot et al, 2017), interaction distance cut-off (Göteman et al, 2015a), a nearest neighbor approach (Sarkar et al, 2016), and Haskind's relation (Flavià and Clément, 2017) have been introduced. Both the iterative and non-iterative versions of the multiple scattering theory have been further developed and used to model the hydrodynamics of wave energy parks (Ji et al, 2015;Konispoliatis and Mavrakos, 2016;Göteman, 2017;Ruiz et al, 2017;Fang et al, 2018;Giassi and Göteman, 2018;Zheng et al, 2018Zheng et al, , 2019Liu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neuro-surrogate is trained prior to each placement using sampled positions used for the previous buoy placement. 2) Use EvalSet = {2 nd , 3 rd , 6 th , 9 th , ..., 15 th } so the neuro-surrogate is used to place buoys: 4, 5, 7,8,10,11,13,14,16.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%