2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12525-016-0228-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting user behavior in electronic markets based on personality-mining in large online social networks

Abstract: Determining a user's preferences is an important condition for effectively operating automatic recommendation systems. Since personality theory claims that a user's personality substantially influences preference, I propose a personality-based product recommender (PBPR) framework to analyze social media data in order to predict a user's personality and to subsequently derive its personalitybased product preferences. The PBRS framework will be evaluated as an IT-artefact with a unique online social network XING… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
0
72
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of BDACs in enhancing incremental innovation capabilities can be discerned in several examples, such as alterations to products and services (Y. Wang, Kung and Byrd, 2018), personalization of offered marketing approaches and services (Buettner, 2017;Xu, Frankwick and Ramirez, 2016), changes in client interfaces (Lehrer et al, 2018), improved efficiency in supply chain management methods (Waller and Fawcett, 2013), as well as modified means of system risk analysis and fault detection (Hu et al, 2010). Similarly, several examples of enhanced radical innovation capabilities are described in the literature, including the development of novel products, such as that of personalized medicine, that integrate systems biology such as genomics with electronic health record data to provide more effective treatments (Alyass, Turcotte and Meyre, 2015), new services such as adaptive learning systems that build on a broad range of data and interactions of users with their learning environments (Maseleno et al, 2018), and developing new processes such as that of decision-aiding tools for detection, characterization and monitoring of diseases in imagerecognition tasks related to radiology, for instance (Hosny et al, 2018).…”
Section: Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of BDACs in enhancing incremental innovation capabilities can be discerned in several examples, such as alterations to products and services (Y. Wang, Kung and Byrd, 2018), personalization of offered marketing approaches and services (Buettner, 2017;Xu, Frankwick and Ramirez, 2016), changes in client interfaces (Lehrer et al, 2018), improved efficiency in supply chain management methods (Waller and Fawcett, 2013), as well as modified means of system risk analysis and fault detection (Hu et al, 2010). Similarly, several examples of enhanced radical innovation capabilities are described in the literature, including the development of novel products, such as that of personalized medicine, that integrate systems biology such as genomics with electronic health record data to provide more effective treatments (Alyass, Turcotte and Meyre, 2015), new services such as adaptive learning systems that build on a broad range of data and interactions of users with their learning environments (Maseleno et al, 2018), and developing new processes such as that of decision-aiding tools for detection, characterization and monitoring of diseases in imagerecognition tasks related to radiology, for instance (Hosny et al, 2018).…”
Section: Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is why more extensive experimentation is necessary using datasets that contain similar data to schizophrenia behavior. Furthermore, it is sufficiently apparent that medication and personality [50][51][52] influence the EEG data of schizophrenic patients, and as a result, our classifier. While the internal validity of our model is very high due to the rigorous k-fold-crossvalidation, improving external validity by training with additional datasets is also an important step to improve the model.…”
Section: Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, medication and personality [43][44][45] influence EEG data, and as a result, our classifier. While the internal validity of our model is very high due to the rigorous k-fold-cross-validation, improving external validity by training with additional datasets is also an important step to improve the model.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%