2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.11.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting treatment outcomes of the Empowerment group intervention for refugees with affective disorders: Findings from the MEHIRA project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14 In addition, Empowerment proved to be effective in reducing depressive symptoms in RAS. 18,19 Cost-effectiveness analysis supported the hypothesis that Empowerment is cost-effective compared with TAU concerning the improvement of symptoms. There was an 87% probability of obtaining an additional effect without additional costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…14 In addition, Empowerment proved to be effective in reducing depressive symptoms in RAS. 18,19 Cost-effectiveness analysis supported the hypothesis that Empowerment is cost-effective compared with TAU concerning the improvement of symptoms. There was an 87% probability of obtaining an additional effect without additional costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A detailed description of the trial, 15 the main publication on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the SCCM, 16 and intervention-specific evaluations of the effectiveness 18 and predictors of the Empowerment intervention 19 are available elsewhere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Die Gruppenpsychotherapie Empowerment [14] wurde 2017 im Rahmen der multizentrischen Studie MEHIRA (Mental Health in Refugees and Asylum Seekers) an der Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Universität München entwickelt und innerhalb eines gestuften Versorgungsmodells für Geflüchtete mit affektiven Erkrankungen implementiert [15,16]. In einer Stichprobe von 149 Geflüchteten zeigte die Intervention eine klinische Wirksamkeit [17], breite Anwendbarkeit [18] und Kosten-Effektivität [19] im Vergleich zur Routineversorgung (Treatment-as-usual). beim Ein-und Durchschlafen sowie Konzentrationsprobleme und Kopfschmerzen, häufig in Zusammenhang mit Lärm in der Gemeinschaftsunterkunft.…”
Section: Interventionunclassified