The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.3390/sym12061054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the Volume of Response to Tweets Posted by a Single Twitter Account

Abstract: Social media users, including organizations, often struggle to acquire the maximum number of responses from other users, but predicting the responses that a post will receive before publication is highly desirable. Previous studies have analyzed why a given tweet may become more popular than others, and have used a variety of models trained to predict the response that a given tweet will receive. The present research addresses the prediction of response measures available on Twitter, including likes, replies a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only case in which DL methods provided low performance was that of a pre-trained Roberta large model without any training on the data set in question. By comparing our results with those for similar methods applied to other Twitter text analysis domains, such as sentiment analysis [24] or the prediction of user response to Twitter posts [24] we find that the order of performance of the used methods agrees with those from other research: recent DL methods fine-tuned in a supervised manner on problem-specific data provide the highest prediction quality.…”
Section: A Overall Methods Performancesupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only case in which DL methods provided low performance was that of a pre-trained Roberta large model without any training on the data set in question. By comparing our results with those for similar methods applied to other Twitter text analysis domains, such as sentiment analysis [24] or the prediction of user response to Twitter posts [24] we find that the order of performance of the used methods agrees with those from other research: recent DL methods fine-tuned in a supervised manner on problem-specific data provide the highest prediction quality.…”
Section: A Overall Methods Performancesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Twitter language is also known to have both oral and written language characteristics as debated by Wikström in [22], and Garber in [23], and the language of tweets addressed to USNTA demonstrates numerous elements of military specifics and jargon, for example, the use of acronyms such as "BZ" (Bravo Zulu), "SAPR survey" (Sexual Assault Prevention and Response survey), or "TADMUS" (tactical decision-making under stress). In this research, we have used tweets published in a previous Twitter-related study regarding sentiment analysis by Fiok et al [24].…”
Section: A Addressed Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond single tweet classification, tweet popularitylikes, retweets, number of replies, etc.-has been studied using account information (Matsumoto et al 2019;Fiok et al 2020) and linguistic information (Wang, Chen, and Kan 2012). Hate and counter hate have also been studied beyond single tweets.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicting popularity of messages is a straightforward task from the perspective of machine learning and has been framed both as a regression (Lampos et al, 2014) and classification problem (Hong et al, 2011;Jenders et al, 2013;Subramanian et al, 2018;Fiok et al, 2020), while work on information cascades (Zhao et al, 2015;Li et al, 2017;Zhou et al, 2021) focuses on modeling the entire lifetime of a post as a point process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%