The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the impacts of wind farms on seabirds: An individual‐based model

Abstract: Abstract1. Individual-based models (IBMs) are a powerful tool in predicting the consequences of environmental change on animal populations and supporting evidence-based decision making for conservation planning.2. There are increasing proposals for wind farms in UK waters and seabirds are a vulnerable group, which may be at risk from these developments.3. We developed a spatially explicit IBM to investigate the potential impacts of the installation of wind farms in the English Channel and North Sea on body mas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes several species of birds, cetaceans, and possibly fish, which are groups that have been reported to be displaced by noise (Gibson et al, 2017;Shannon et al, 2016). It differs from previous models developed for assessing impacts of anthropogenic disturbances in marine environments (Langton, Davies, & Scott, 2014;Topping & Petersen 2011;Warwick-Evans, Atkinson, Walkington, & Green, 2018) in explicitly considering the links between disturbances/noise, animal movement, fitness and population dynamics. The generality of the processes included in the model should, in principle, allow realistic population dynamics to emerge, but lack of independent data currently precludes corroboration of model predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes several species of birds, cetaceans, and possibly fish, which are groups that have been reported to be displaced by noise (Gibson et al, 2017;Shannon et al, 2016). It differs from previous models developed for assessing impacts of anthropogenic disturbances in marine environments (Langton, Davies, & Scott, 2014;Topping & Petersen 2011;Warwick-Evans, Atkinson, Walkington, & Green, 2018) in explicitly considering the links between disturbances/noise, animal movement, fitness and population dynamics. The generality of the processes included in the model should, in principle, allow realistic population dynamics to emerge, but lack of independent data currently precludes corroboration of model predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date most research on environmental impact of WFs, and possible mitigation measures have been developed in relation to avian species, such as sea birds and raptors, and bats (e.g., Thaxter et al, 2017;Warwick-Evans, Atkinson, Walkington, & Green, 2018;Wiens et al, 2017). Research on how WF developments affect terrestrial animals is increasing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, alternate solutions to direct observation of distribution patterns, such as atsea surveys or individual level tracking (e.g., Carroll et al, 2019), are required. Several methodologies for estimating seabird at-sea distribution in un-sampled regions have been proposed (Franklin, 2010;Grecian et al, 2012;Thaxter et al, 2012;Grimm et al, 2016;Soanes et al, 2016;Wakefield et al, 2017;Warwick-Evans et al, 2017Zhang et al, 2017;Critchley et al, 2018Critchley et al, , 2019Dias et al, 2018b; Supplementary Appendix: Determining at-sea distribution). Determining which method is most appropriate to derive species at-sea distributions should be considered in the context of available data for a given species and its typical foraging ecology (Cleasby et al, 2018;Oppel et al, 2018;Bolton et al, 2019).…”
Section: Determining At-sea Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%