2010
DOI: 10.2112/08-1174.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the Impact of Large-Scale Tidal Wetland Restoration on Morphodynamics and Habitat Evolution in South San Francisco Bay, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the estuary, tidal marsh ecosystems are well recognized for their significance as fish and wildlife habitat (Skinner 1962;Warnock and Takekawa 1995;Meng and Matern 2001;Matern et al 2002;Brew and Williams 2010;Demers et al 2010;Gewant and Bollens 2011;Athearn et al 2012;Thorne et al 2012), but much less consideration has been directed toward the potential for these ecosystems to serve as a pillar of food web support for the greater estuary (Sobczak et al 2005;Stepanauskas et al 2005;Howe and Simenstad 2007;Cohen and Bollens 2008;Grimaldo et al 2009;Howe and Simenstad 2011). Food limitation has been suggested as a contributing driver of the POD, but conceptual models focus on food web linkages among fish, zooplankton and phytoplankton, rather than the trophic role of detritus-based food webs associated with emergent tidal marsh wetlands (Sommer et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the estuary, tidal marsh ecosystems are well recognized for their significance as fish and wildlife habitat (Skinner 1962;Warnock and Takekawa 1995;Meng and Matern 2001;Matern et al 2002;Brew and Williams 2010;Demers et al 2010;Gewant and Bollens 2011;Athearn et al 2012;Thorne et al 2012), but much less consideration has been directed toward the potential for these ecosystems to serve as a pillar of food web support for the greater estuary (Sobczak et al 2005;Stepanauskas et al 2005;Howe and Simenstad 2007;Cohen and Bollens 2008;Grimaldo et al 2009;Howe and Simenstad 2011). Food limitation has been suggested as a contributing driver of the POD, but conceptual models focus on food web linkages among fish, zooplankton and phytoplankton, rather than the trophic role of detritus-based food webs associated with emergent tidal marsh wetlands (Sommer et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, cohesive mud is more difficult to erode than sand when it consolidates, so that on the estuary-scale mud leads to narrower systems with reduced bar dynamics through mudflat accumulation . The logical hypothesis is that the added effect of vegetation leads to even more accretion at the flanks of the estuary (Brew and Williams, 2010).…”
Section: Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tidal influence was returned to the area by breaching a levee at the southern end of the site. The restoration process is driven by tidal transport of sediment building the marsh plain to the appropriate level (Brew and Williams, 2010), then seed dispersal via tidal hydrochory driving the development of vegetation (Diggory and Parker, 2011). In addition to the passive restoration process via seed dispersal, the Invasive Spartina Project actively planted selected portions of the site with the native cordgrass Spartina foliosa, Distichlis spicata (saltgrass), and Grindelia stricta (marsh gumplant) (Hammond, 2016).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%