2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.08.25.22279237
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the efficacy of variant-modified COVID-19 vaccine boosters

Abstract: As a result of the emergence and circulation of antigenically distinct SARS-CoV-2 variants, a number of variant-modified COVID-19 vaccines have been developed. Here we perform a meta-analysis of the available data on neutralisation titres from clinical studies comparing booster vaccination with either the current ancestral-based vaccines or variant-modified vaccines. We then use this to predict the relative efficacies of these booster vaccines under different scenarios.

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, animals that received a primary mRNA-1273 series, and were boosted with PBS, showed rather marginal protection against lung infection. These results showing protective benefit of matched bivalent vaccine boosters targeting Omicron variants are consistent with studies in mice immunized with mRNA-1273, boosted with a monovalent mRNA-1273.529 vaccine, and challenged with BA.1 12 , and predictive models in humans 30 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In comparison, animals that received a primary mRNA-1273 series, and were boosted with PBS, showed rather marginal protection against lung infection. These results showing protective benefit of matched bivalent vaccine boosters targeting Omicron variants are consistent with studies in mice immunized with mRNA-1273, boosted with a monovalent mRNA-1273.529 vaccine, and challenged with BA.1 12 , and predictive models in humans 30 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…(period-specific SUARs). Multiple immunological, epidemiological and/or modeling studies have reinforced the improved protection afforded by hybrid (vaccine + infection) immunity over that induced by either exposure alone [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. In general, booster doses using ancestral Wuhan-like antigen among previously-infected individuals have resulted in transient increased protection with marginal incremental improvement against severe outcomes.…”
Section: Suarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ratio increases in VE are supported by preliminary serologic data for bivalent ancestral- and Omicron-targeted vaccines, compared to ancestral-targeted vaccine only. 25 Our model also includes the same waning of protection over time for first- and next-generation vaccines, and a 50% higher unit cost for multivalent vaccines compared to both first-generation and Omicron-targeted vaccines. Whilst these seem reasonable assumptions at the time of writing, it will be important to revise these assumptions as with updated estimates of expected VE and waning (e.g., based on in vitro antibody titers 26,27 or, ideally, real-world VE studies) and updated costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%