2003
DOI: 10.1037/1522-3736.6.0021a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Teachers' and Schools' Implementation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program: A Multilevel Study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
103
2
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
103
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous research, we found that perceived school support, belief that the program was beneficial, and comfort with implementation were associated with higher levels of implementation fidelity (Beets et al, 2008; Ennett et al, 2003; Gregory et al, 2007; Kallestad & Olweus, 2003; Kam et al, 2003; Klimes-Dougan et al, 2009; Ringwalt et al, 2003). Given the considerable pressures teachers face to prepare students for standardized tests, prevention curricula are often seen as ancillary (Ringwalt et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with previous research, we found that perceived school support, belief that the program was beneficial, and comfort with implementation were associated with higher levels of implementation fidelity (Beets et al, 2008; Ennett et al, 2003; Gregory et al, 2007; Kallestad & Olweus, 2003; Kam et al, 2003; Klimes-Dougan et al, 2009; Ringwalt et al, 2003). Given the considerable pressures teachers face to prepare students for standardized tests, prevention curricula are often seen as ancillary (Ringwalt et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, when a principal supports the implementation of an intervention, teachers are likely to implement the program with greater fidelity (Gregory, Henry, & Schoeny, 2007; Kam, Greenberg, & Walls, 2003; Ringwalt et al, 2003). Other factors, such as teachers' beliefs about the benefits of a particular program and comfort implementing the program, have also been shown to increase implementation fidelity (Beets et al, 2008; Ennett et al, 2003; Kallestad & Olweus, 2003; Klimes-Dougan et al, 2009; Little, Sussman, Sun, & Rohrbach, 2013; Ringwalt et al, 2003). The influence of these types of contextual factors on the fidelity of prevention program implementation in schools is an integral, yet often overlooked, part of implementation research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, teachers’ favorable beliefs about the value of Project TND following the standard training workshop were negatively associated with implementation fidelity. This finding is inconsistent with previous studies that have shown when providers’ beliefs are favorable towards the prevention program, implementation fidelity is higher (Beets, et al, 2008; Kallestad & Olweus, 2003; Klimes-Dougan, et al, 2009; Ringwalt, et al, 2003). However, our findings are consistent with one published study that found that teachers’ support for the research-based program was inversely associated with their use of the program’s interactive teaching techniques during program implementation (Mihalic, et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Organizational characteristics are also central to understanding implementation fidelity, because administrators, teachers and students are embedded within the shared environment of the school and school district (Domitrovich et al 2008). Implementation fidelity of prevention programs has been associated with various aspects of the school climate, such as capacity for change, openness to change, and positive communication between teachers and administrators (Beets et al 2008; Ennett et al 2003; Gittelsohn et al 2003; Gottfredson and Gottfredson 2002; Kallestad and Olweus 2003; Klimes-Dougan et al 2009; Rohrbach et al 2005). Additionally, when a program aligns with a school’s policies, it is more likely to be implemented with quality (Kallestad and Olweus 2003; Payne et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation