“…where A is the path length, W is the width, and a and b are regression constants. This model holds both for error-free [3], [38] and error-inclusive MT data [17], [41]. Previous studies have shown the validity of the model for various conditions such as using touchpads and trackballs [2] and moving towards various directions [29], [45].…”
Section: Time-prediction Model For Path-steering Tasksmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In contrast, for the Keep rule, particularly for narrow path conditions, it is possible that some participants failed all ten trials and thus ER was 100%, resulting in no error-free MTs. Because the steering law holds for error-inclusive MT data [17], [41], we apply all ten trials' MTs to the steering law.…”
A previous study on target pointing has shown that the accuracy of performance models improves as the number of participants and clicks increases, but the task was limited to artificially simplified one-dimensional movements. Practical user interfaces often require more complex operations, and thus we examine the effects of the number of participants and task repetitions on the fit of existing models for path-steering tasks. Empirical results showed that the model for predicting movement times consistently fitted the data with high accuracy, even when the numbers of participants and repetitions were small. However, the model for predicting error rates was less accurate in terms of R 2 , MAE, and RMSE. Therefore, the benefit of recruiting numerous participants is relatively greater for the error-rate prediction model, which supports the previous study on target-pointing tasks.
“…where A is the path length, W is the width, and a and b are regression constants. This model holds both for error-free [3], [38] and error-inclusive MT data [17], [41]. Previous studies have shown the validity of the model for various conditions such as using touchpads and trackballs [2] and moving towards various directions [29], [45].…”
Section: Time-prediction Model For Path-steering Tasksmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In contrast, for the Keep rule, particularly for narrow path conditions, it is possible that some participants failed all ten trials and thus ER was 100%, resulting in no error-free MTs. Because the steering law holds for error-inclusive MT data [17], [41], we apply all ten trials' MTs to the steering law.…”
A previous study on target pointing has shown that the accuracy of performance models improves as the number of participants and clicks increases, but the task was limited to artificially simplified one-dimensional movements. Practical user interfaces often require more complex operations, and thus we examine the effects of the number of participants and task repetitions on the fit of existing models for path-steering tasks. Empirical results showed that the model for predicting movement times consistently fitted the data with high accuracy, even when the numbers of participants and repetitions were small. However, the model for predicting error rates was less accurate in terms of R 2 , MAE, and RMSE. Therefore, the benefit of recruiting numerous participants is relatively greater for the error-rate prediction model, which supports the previous study on target-pointing tasks.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.