2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting students’ learning strategies: The contribution of chronotype over personality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, this contradictory finding is interesting, because Tsaousis (2010) detected a slight positive effect between morningness and extraversion in the metaanalysis, while there was no relationship in the single studies (with the exemption of Ruffing et al, 2015). This relationship between morningness and extraversion emerged in a similar direction and size in this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Nevertheless, this contradictory finding is interesting, because Tsaousis (2010) detected a slight positive effect between morningness and extraversion in the metaanalysis, while there was no relationship in the single studies (with the exemption of Ruffing et al, 2015). This relationship between morningness and extraversion emerged in a similar direction and size in this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The sample investigated in this study was part of the German longitudinal Study on Individual and Organizational Influences on Study Performance in Teacher Education (SioS; Kaub et al, 2012 ; Reichl et al, 2014 ; Ruffing et al, 2015 ) at Saarland University. The project aimed at investigating professional competencies in teacher education by means of a longitudinal 6-years assessment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los factores de sensibilidad emocional (I) y el de suspicacia (L), y Dominancia (E) nos indican que los estudiantes presentan un alto nivel de competitividad, y autosuficiencia en sus tareas, sin caer en la culpa obsesiva, de acuerdo con los resultados obtenidos en el factor O vinculado a las tendencias a la culpabilidad. Esta realidad revela una tendencia natural a no dejarse arrastrar por prejuicios, a mostrar interdependencia entre las imposiciones dogmática de los grupos y a descubrir diversidad de accesos a las experiencias desde su perspectiva cognitiva (Zuffian et al, 2013;Vedel, 2014;Ruffing et al,2015;Zhou, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified