2019
DOI: 10.3390/e21121216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Student Performance and Deficiency in Mastering Knowledge Points in MOOCs Using Multi-Task Learning

Abstract: Massive open online courses (MOOCs), which have been deemed a revolutionary teaching mode, are increasingly being used in higher education. However, there remain deficiencies in understanding the relationship between online behavior of students and their performance, and in verifying how well a student comprehends learning material. Therefore, we propose a method for predicting student performance and mastery of knowledge points in MOOCs based on assignment-related online behavior; this allows for those provid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, our results show greater robustness than those obtained in [19] in which it was possible to obtain values of accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score of 87.44%, 52.84%, 50.68% and 51.73% respectively, to be applied in predicting students graduating on time. This affirmation can be sustained in the study of [29] where it is pointed out that these metrics reflect a high capacity of the classification model, because, the greater the recall, the greater the capacity of the model to recognize positive instances, the greater the Whatever the accuracy, the capacity of the model to distinguish instances will be reflected, finding the F1 score as the combination of the two metrics, in this sense, the higher the F1 score, the more solid the classification model will be. Validated the use of the SVM Quadratic algorithm in the predictive model of the satisfaction of university students, the classification model is evaluated by means of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) technique, which allows us to visualize the balance between the rate of true positives (TPR) and the false negative rate (FNR).…”
Section: Figure 2 Algorithm Accuracy Validationmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In turn, our results show greater robustness than those obtained in [19] in which it was possible to obtain values of accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score of 87.44%, 52.84%, 50.68% and 51.73% respectively, to be applied in predicting students graduating on time. This affirmation can be sustained in the study of [29] where it is pointed out that these metrics reflect a high capacity of the classification model, because, the greater the recall, the greater the capacity of the model to recognize positive instances, the greater the Whatever the accuracy, the capacity of the model to distinguish instances will be reflected, finding the F1 score as the combination of the two metrics, in this sense, the higher the F1 score, the more solid the classification model will be. Validated the use of the SVM Quadratic algorithm in the predictive model of the satisfaction of university students, the classification model is evaluated by means of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) technique, which allows us to visualize the balance between the rate of true positives (TPR) and the false negative rate (FNR).…”
Section: Figure 2 Algorithm Accuracy Validationmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, e-learning has been widely used worldwide due to its high temporal and spatial flexibility, low knowledge acquisition threshold, and rich learning resources. However, in this mode, teachers cannot easily perceive the learning status of their learners 2 , and questions about the quality of e-learning have been raised. The study of learning performance prediction provides a basis for teachers to adjust their teaching methods for students who may have problems by predicting students’ performance on future exams, reducing the risk of students failing to pass the course, and ensuring the quality of e-learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al [33] where the authors point out that an accuracy greater than 90, it is possible to optimally predict the graduation of the students. This statement is supported by [34], in this study the authors state that in supervised learning the precision of the algorithm depends on the accuracy, for this reason it is important that this indicator provides us with optimal values. In relation to the evaluation of the performance indicators through the confusion matrix where an average sensitivity of 97.9%, a specificity of 99.1% and precision of 96.7% are observed, which validate the capacity of the weighted KNN algorithm to correctly predict the perception of university teaching performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%