2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting stem diameters and aboveground biomass of individual trees using remote sensing data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first part of the analysis, only H and CD were used as input in order to compare the obtained results with those reported in Dalponte et al (2018). Tab.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the first part of the analysis, only H and CD were used as input in order to compare the obtained results with those reported in Dalponte et al (2018). Tab.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate our methods, each dataset (i.e., Hadeland, and Våler) was divided in two subsets (same as in Dalponte et al 2018). The first set was used for calibration and the second for the validation phase.…”
Section: Parameter Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To improve the accuracy of mangrove biomass estimation and mapping, more remote sensing data and methods have been tested and applied to mangroves [4,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Very high resolution images, such as WorldView-2 (Digitalglobe, Westminster, CO, USA), GeoEye (GeoEye, Herndon, VA, USA), IKONOS (Spacing Imaging, Herndon, VA, USA), QuickBird (Digitalglobe, Westminster, CO, USA), digital photographs, and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) point cloud data, can be used for extracting individual trees [21][22][23][24][25][26], as well as the accurate estimation of AGB or carbon stocks at the individual tree level [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%